X-Git-Url: http://git.nikiroo.be/?a=blobdiff_plain;ds=sidebyside;f=test%2Fexpected%2FSLASHDOT%2F0102640274.html;h=e071f7f867ca748e991a38efbf620a90e868c02e;hb=a6a7ff9f2e7f42f17eaa69be2bfad201195b3eb4;hp=8cc13686ff6020898f8f53efaba081e26db7e2fd;hpb=299a08f325f3de71e191b17b16a120d1714e3d7c;p=gofetch.git
diff --git a/test/expected/SLASHDOT/0102640274.html b/test/expected/SLASHDOT/0102640274.html
index 8cc1368..e071f7f 100644
--- a/test/expected/SLASHDOT/0102640274.html
+++ b/test/expected/SLASHDOT/0102640274.html
@@ -9,11 +9,12 @@
-
Professor Who Coined Term 'Net Neutrality' Thinks It's Time To Break Up Facebook (theverge.com)
+
Professor Who Coined Term 'Net Neutrality' Thinks It's Time To Break Up Facebook (theverge.com)
(Thursday September 06, 2018 @11:30PM (BeauHD)
from the easier-said-than-done dept.)
@@ -23,151 +24,151 @@ from the easier-said-than-done dept.)
Safe Harbor (Score:5, Interesting)
+Safe Harbor (Score:5, Interesting)
There's a simpler way:
[1]https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
If they want to curate content according to their political bias, then treat them like the politically-biased media outlets they are, legally liable for the content they host, instead of platforms under "safe harbor" protections. If they want to continue to be treated like platforms, then they can keep their hands off their political opponents' speech.
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uMLLlnRCBqg
Re: (Score:2)
+Re: (Score:2)
They're already not 'common carriers' so they really didn't lose anything by curating.
The solution is to reestablish 'common carrier' protections for those web forums that deserve it.
Re:Safe Harbor (Score:4, Interesting)
+Re:Safe Harbor (Score:4, Interesting)
I didn't read the article, but the summary has nothing to do with what you're talking about. The issue at hand is monopolies and the consequent stifling of innovation and lack of competitive pressure, that being the only thing which makes our economy work for people instead of against them.