X-Git-Url: http://git.nikiroo.be/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=test%2Fexpected%2FSLASHDOT%2F0102639856;fp=test%2Fexpected%2FSLASHDOT%2F0102639856;h=1492addcd7dc034f33356a8064918db54d11d3f9;hb=299a08f325f3de71e191b17b16a120d1714e3d7c;hp=0000000000000000000000000000000000000000;hpb=1aaa6ba3686a5a14f2957b6b8d02ffc0903f6832;p=gofetch.git diff --git a/test/expected/SLASHDOT/0102639856 b/test/expected/SLASHDOT/0102639856 new file mode 100644 index 0000000..1492add --- /dev/null +++ b/test/expected/SLASHDOT/0102639856 @@ -0,0 +1,847 @@ + 'I'VE SEEN THE FUTURE OF CONSUMER AI, AND IT DOESN'T HAVE ONE' + (THEREGISTER.CO.UK) + + Thursday September 06, 2018 @11:30PM (msmash) + from the there-is-no-spoon dept. + + o News link: https://tech.slashdot.org/story/18/09/06/205221/ive-seen-the-future-of-consumer-ai-and-it-doesnt-have-one + o Source link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/09/05/consumer_ai_ifa_2018_roundup/ + + + Andrew Orlowski of The Register recounts all the gadgets + supercharged with AI that he came across at IFA tradeshow last + week -- and wonders what value AI brought to the table. He + writes: I didn't see a blockchain toothbrush at IFA in Berlin + last week, but I'm sure there was one lurking about somewhere. + With 30 vast halls to cover, I didn't look too hard for it. + But I did see many things almost as tragic that no one could + miss -- AI being squeezed into almost every conceivable bit of + consumer electronics. But none were convincing. If ever there + was a solution looking for a problem, it's ramming AI into + gadgets to show of a company's machine learning prowess. For + the consumer it adds unreliability, cost and complexity, and + the annoyance of being prompted. [...] Back to LG, which takes + 2018's prize for sticking AI into a superfluous gadget. The + centrepiece of its AI efforts this year is a robot, ClOi. Put + Google Assistant or Alexa on wheels, and you have ClOi. I + asked the booth person what exactly ClOi could do to be told + "it can take notes for your shopping list." Why wasn't this + miracle of the Fourth Industrial Revolution let loose on the + LG floor? I wondered -- a question answered by this account of + ClOi's debut at CES in January. Clearly things haven't + improved much -- this robot buddy was kept indoors. + + + ** Stupid industry fads (Score:5, Funny) + (by Spy Handler ( 822350 )) + + + 3D printer in every home will fundamentally change human society + IoT internet connected belt buckles and toothbrushes will take + over the world + AI will revolutionize consumer electronics + Net PC from Sun will dominate the computer industry (this one is + really old) + + ** Re:Stupid industry fads (Score:5, Insightful) + (by ShanghaiBill ( 739463 )) + + + Excessive hype is always followed by a trough of + disillusionment. But as the TOD fades, plenty of mature, + practical applications are likely to emerge. The + technological naysayers are usually even more wrong than the + hypesters. + [1]Hype cycle [wikipedia.org] + + + + + [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hype_cycle + + ** Re: (Score:2) + (by fahrbot-bot ( 874524 )) + + + > Excessive hype is always followed by a trough of + > disillusionment. + Pro Tip: Get out in front and mention this *before* taking + your date home. Better for her to hear it from you than + her working it out on her own ... :-) + + + ** Re:Stupid industry fads (Score:4, Insightful) + (by CaptainDork ( 3678879 )) + + + If smart phones and tablets are any indicator ... + AI, too, is an evolutionary dead end. + It's a buzz word with a vacuous definition. + + ** Re: (Score:2) + (by Q-Hack! ( 37846 )) + + + Not a lot different than back in the 1950's when the + trend was to create all manor of odd gadgets to make + life easier. Those deemed useful are still around... + The rest can be found in junk markets around the world. + But hey, the Cracker-barrel's of the future will still + need stuff to decorate their walls with. + + ** Re: (Score:2) + (by CaptainDork ( 3678879 )) + + + In reaction to your sig: + I recently re-read "Nineteen Eighty-Four," because + my first reading was so long ago. + Good read, but what a goddam depressing book! + + + + + ** Re: (Score:2) + (by magzteel ( 5013587 )) + + + > Excessive hype is always followed by a trough of + > disillusionment. But as the TOD fades, plenty of mature, + > practical applications are likely to emerge. The + > technological naysayers are usually even more wrong than + > the hypesters. + > [1]Hype cycle [wikipedia.org] + Back in the early PC days, when you had to hook up a + cassette player to load your application, and then another + one to load your data, we used to tell people they could + store recipes on their TRS-80 personal computer. This was + not much of a productivity enhancer. I'm sure based on + this experience some people would have thought PC's were + useless and had no future. + And then floppy disks and spreadsheets were invented. + + + + + [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hype_cycle + + + ** Re: (Score:2) + (by jythie ( 914043 )) + + + It is really difficult to say if the naysayers or + hypesters are more often right or wrong. One problem with + looking back at negative guesses is we only really + remember the ones that turned out to be wrong since the + evidence is in modern use today, while all the naysayers + that we right, well, the things they were right about + faded into obscurity. + + ** Re: (Score:2) + (by ShanghaiBill ( 739463 )) + + + You only count as a "true" naysayer if you are negative + about an overhyped trend with groupies and fanbois, not + about an obviously stupid idea. + The naysayers were right about the Segway, but that was + an easy target, since it reached peak hype before it + had even been shown to the public. + Other tech failures were Iridium, Zune, Pebble, + Juicero. But none of these were hyped as world changing + technology. + + + + ** + + ** Re: (Score:2) + (by ShanghaiBill ( 739463 )) + + + > In the long term only 1/20 companies really make it. + Success of a technology is rarely correlated with the + success of particular companies. Silicon Valley is + littered with plaques marking the graves of + semiconductor pioneering companies. Few of them + survived. Yet semiconductors have been the greatest + technological success since fire was tamed. + For another example, look at aviation. It took 66 years + to go from Kitty Hawk to the Sea of Tranquility. Yet + how many airlines made money during those years? Almost + none. + + + + + ** Re: (Score:1) + (by atherophage ( 2481624 )) + + + Prognosticators have been wrong before. While it is easy to + poke fun at the unusual who knows, perhaps in a few years + dental floss will come with AI. The thought of not having AI + floss will be unthinkable. + + + ** Re: (Score:3, Interesting) + (by Anonymous Coward) + + + As much as I am a nerd, I blame "nerds" for this. There is + this whole new fad of being a "techie", watching Big Bang + Theory, owning a Tesla, and generally being absolutely + ignorant about real science, technology and math while + "pretending" to be a nerd. I used "pretending" but there may + be some legitimate attempt but it is hard to tell if someone + is a fake nerd or just a stupid nerd. I think this trend + partly follows from women trying to follow the (tech) money + and then men trying to follow the women. + This + + ** Re: (Score:2) + (by AbRASiON ( 589899 ) *) + + + I don't know that there's a lot of these people but they + do exist, for certain yes. The 'watching big bang theory' + is the kicker, once someone admits watching that, you know + they're very unlikely to be a 'proper nerd' for lack of a + better term. + Considering they only have partial skills in technology + then, we can likely guess, if they work in the industry, + they're probably higher on the ladder than us and paid + more though :/ like most management / consultant types. + + + + ** Re: (Score:3) + (by JMJimmy ( 2036122 )) + + + The thing no one can consider is time. + "AI" being jammed into things now is probably lame, awkward, + and of very limited use. Much like computers were back in the + punch card days with devices that. Less than 100 years later + we've got computers in our pocket. We are in the early days + of AI - we'll look back on it decades from now as we do with + things like: [1]https://www.youtube.com/watch?... + [youtube.com] + This article is just another example of someone who can't see + past their nose to the road ahead and the million differen + + + + + [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sp7MHZY2ADI + + + ** Re: (Score:2) + (by AHuxley ( 892839 )) + + + Good for a few workers over the decade of hype. + + + ** Re: (Score:2) + (by m00sh ( 2538182 )) + + + > 3D printer in every home will fundamentally change human + > society + > IoT internet connected belt buckles and toothbrushes will + > take over the world + > AI will revolutionize consumer electronics + > Net PC from Sun will dominate the computer industry (this one + > is really old) + I don't know about home but it plays a big part in + manufacturing. There are very specialized and successful + medical companies that use 3d printing. + Don't know about belt buckles but fitbit, apple watch, garmin + has been worth billions of dollars and fundamentally changed + the way a lot of people do things. + I don't know about NetPC but what about the cloud? The hype + that we would all put all our stuff in the cloud blah blah + actually materialized. There are many companies who own no + hardware except the dev la + + + ** Re: (Score:2) + (by lokedhs ( 672255 )) + + + Net PC was not from Sun. I should I know, I worked for them + during that era. What they had was JavaStation, which was a + neat idea but ahead of its time. That concept is now realised + by the Chromebook. Net PC was a Compaq thing, if I recall + correctly. However, Wikipedia tells me it was Oracle, so + perhaps the Compaq device was called something else. + + + ** + + ** Re: (Score:2) + (by bobbied ( 2522392 )) + + + > Example: Apple will go under...any day now....since 1984 + But they've been totally correct in not predicting the "Year + of the Linux Desktop" has come. + You win a few and lose a few. + + ** Re: (Score:2) + (by jythie ( 914043 )) + + + *nod* to expand on this.... true, Apple never did go + under. But look how many computer companies started up + around the same time and did. It is fun to look at the + successes and compare them to the naysayers who were + wrong, but the ones who were right, well, their + predictions did not leave much to talk about today. + + + + ** + + ** Re:Now With AI! (Score:5, Informative) + (by ShanghaiBill ( 739463 )) + + + > Gee, I could have sworn we already HAD the AI craze back in + > the late 80s. Or was it early 90s? + It was the 1980s. It had faded long before 1990. + But there was an earlier AI craze in the 1960s, based on + perceptrons. That faded by 1970. + The 1980 AI hype cycle was driven by "expert systems" and + "Lisp machines". + The latest cycle started in 2006 with the publication of the + [1]seminal paper on deep learning [sciencemag.org], and has + so far lasted far longer than any previous AI hype cycle. + + + + + [1] http://science.sciencemag.org/content/313/5786/504 + + ** Re: (Score:2) + (by CaptainDork ( 3678879 )) + + + I go way back, too. + AI had an unambiguous definition that eroded under stress + because the industry came to the realization that the "I" + part (intelligence) used the human mind as the high bar. + The second epiphany came when no one could fabricate an AI + that would simply refuse to cooperate if Facebook was + unreachable. + + + ** Re: (Score:2) + (by Pseudonym ( 62607 )) + + + In the 90s it was all "knowledge-based systems" and in the + noughties it was all "intelligent agents". + + ** Re: (Score:2) + (by ShanghaiBill ( 739463 )) + + + > In the 90s it was all "knowledge-based systems" and in + > the noughties it was all "intelligent agents". + Yes, but those generated far less hype than what + happened in the 60s, 80s, and teenies. + The big things in the 90s and noughties were the web + and e-commerce. + + + + ** Re: (Score:2) + (by CWCheese ( 729272 )) + + + Thanks for the Lisp reference! I fondly remember learning + Lisp in an AI class during college in the 80s. Actually + enjoyed programming Lisp because it could be so terse and + do so much very rapidly. However, we really had no good + applications to use for it, other than having an + application learn the best way to win a chess game. I + chose not to pursue AI as a career and haven't suffered + for that. + + ** Re: (Score:2) + (by ShanghaiBill ( 739463 )) + + + > I chose not to pursue AI as a career and haven't + > suffered for that. + Learning Lisp would not have helped you. Modern AI uses + mostly Python based libraries such as Tensorflow and + PyTorch. C++ is used for performance critical stuff. + Nobody uses Lisp for AI anymore. It was a dead end. + + + + ** Fifth Generation (Score:2) + (by mcswell ( 1102107 )) + + + Fueling the hype in the 1980s AI cycle was the Japanese + Fifth Generation project, for which a stated goal was to + leapfrog the West's computer technology and skills. People + like Edward Feigenbaum and Pamela McCorduck used the FUD + generated around this project to call for increased + funding, claiming in their 1983 book 'The Fifth + Generation: Japan’s Computer Challenge to the World' that + "America needs a national plan of action, a kind of space + shuttle program for the knowledge systems of the future." + A + + + + ** Re: (Score:2) + (by Torodung ( 31985 )) + + + > Cats on the blockchain, anyone? + Well, at the very least, every zig should be on the + blockchain. Don't know about Cats. + + + ** You can stop reading at "Orlowski" (Score:4, Interesting) + (by serviscope_minor ( 664417 )) + + + Andrew Orlowski of The Register is basically a professional + dickhead. His main goal seems to be to be as obnoxious and + ignorant as possible presumably with the goal of trolling the + readership. He's pretty much the reason I stopped reading the + Register because of the constant streem of utter bullshit from + that guy. + + ** Re:You can stop reading at "Orlowski" (Score:4, Interesting) + (by starless ( 60879 )) + + + And also appears to be climate change denier.... + (at least for some of his Register articles.) + + + ** Re: (Score:2) + (by TJ_Phazerhacki ( 520002 )) + + + So, Walt Mossberg for a new generation? Shutup! + + + ** AI in a Toaster! (Score:2) + (by Zorro ( 15797 )) + + + Red Dwarf has already shown why this is a BAD Idea. + https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lhnN4eUiei4 + + ** Re: (Score:2) + (by Revek ( 133289 )) + + + Please learn basic html K, thanks. + + ** Re: (Score:2) + (by AbRASiON ( 589899 ) *) + + + How about slashdot stop being entirely backwards with that + shit instead? + + + + ** + + ** Re: (Score:2) + (by Applehu Akbar ( 2968043 )) + + + But I do like being able to verbally ask my phone to navigate + to a contact, without having to squint at a screen in the + sun, and get turn by turn directions. Digital assistants have + slipped into a place in my life where they do a few useful + things. As time goes on, this set will grow larger. + But I know: "If it works, it's not AI!" "If it's AI, it won't + work!" + + + ** Aibo (Score:1) + (by Anonymous Coward) + + + If Sony's Aibo lives up to the demos I have seen - that would be + one big application. AI as a pet. + I also use AI (maybe more ML) all the time with photo sorting, + image recognition, etc. It is already in the home. + + ** OP must be joking... (Score:4, Insightful) + (by JoeDuncan ( 874519 )) + + + ... because consumer AI is *ALREADY* ubiquitous and all around + us. + From the face detection in your phone, to the fuzzy logic + controllers in washing machines, to the ant colony algorithms + being used to route network traffic, to finding directions with + google maps, to Netflix and Amazon's recommendation algorithms, + to OCR for cheques and mail, to NEST thermostats, to robot + vacuum cleaners and lawn mowers, to expert systems in medical + diagnosis... (I could keep going) + AI in consumer products is literally *already* ALL around us. + Saying that consumer AI "has no future" is like looking around + at the world today and saying "personal cars have no future" - + it's completely idiotic because to anyone with half an ounce of + perception that future is ALREADY here. + It's like looking at a forest and claiming there are no trees + + ** Re: (Score:2) + (by grahamsz ( 150076 )) + + + Yeah it seems like it is a natural fit in optimizing the + things we do. + Even though I don't routinely use my phone as an alarm clock, + it still knows when i'm likely to get up and if I plug it in + at bed time it'll do a good job of figuring out when i'm + likely to get up and adjusts its charging rate to be done + about an hour before then. Yet if I plug it in a 3pm then + it'll assume i want as much charge as possible and charge as + fast as it can. It's not rocket science, but it's useful. + Do I need a dishwasher with + + ** Re: (Score:2) + (by JoeDuncan ( 874519 )) + + + > Do I need a dishwasher with a screen that I can talk to? + Nope, but I'm willing to bet it has an embedded fuzzy + logic controller in it to control water levels. + + + ** Re: (Score:2) + (by mcswell ( 1102107 )) + + + "Do I need a dishwasher with a screen that I can talk to?" + Printers have a screen. You can't talk to it (at least + you're not supposed to--when aggravated, I've been know to + do so, and not kindly). But try to decipher what's on that + screen. I claim that printers are not any easier to use + than they were in 1984 (which is when I got my first dot + matrix printer). You (ok, I) *still* can't figure out + what's wrong with them, despite the screen. + + + + ** + + ** Re: (Score:2) + (by JoeDuncan ( 874519 )) + + + > None of the tings you mention actually contain any real + > artificial intelligence in the sense of being able to + > making decisions in the face of unknown circumstances and + > data sources. + They do actually. + Roombas have to be able to adapt to unknown obstacles and + uncertain sensory input (could get blocked, partially + occluded etc...). + Embedded fuzzy logic controllers (also used in anti-lock + brakes) have to be able to maintain a steady output signal + given uncertain input (wear and tear on the mechanics, + grit...) that can vary wildly in an unknown manner. + OCR systems need to be able to tell the difference between + a cheque and unknown things, like night club flyers, and + they deal with hand written + + + + ** Re: (Score:1) + (by AHuxley ( 892839 )) + + + Re "face detection" is not AI. Its a really big and fast + database. Filled with faces the police know about and random + people walking past CCTV. + Re "fuzzy logic controllers in washing machines" A set amount + of power, water, weight of laundry is not AI. Just good + programming within set limits. + Re "'finding directions" with maps that are created and set. + Re "recommendation algorithms" that is set by past people + buying things and another person showing the same interests. + More to do with collecting lots + + ** Re: (Score:2) + (by JoeDuncan ( 874519 )) + + + > ..."face detection" is not AI. Its a really big and fast + > database. Filled with faces the police know... + ...and just HOW do the faces "police know" get matched to + this database? Explain without reference to AI. + > ..."fuzzy logic controllers in washing machines" A set + > amount of power, water, weight of laundry is not AI. + No it isn't, but you're a fool if you think your washing + machine is that simple these days. It DOES take fuzzy + logic to adapt to things like wear and tear on the + machine, arbitrarily changing water pressures and + temperatures, etc... and still maintain consistent + performance. + > "'finding directions" with maps that are created and set. + ...and using AI algorithms to find the best path. + Blah blah blah... you get the point. You've deliberately + downplayed the AI aspect + + + + ** + + ** Re: (Score:2) + (by JoeDuncan ( 874519 )) + + + You are clearly uneducated, Troll. + If you actually wish to enlighten yourself, I'd start + here: [1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org] + + + + + [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_intelligence + + + + ** Re: (Score:2) + (by hazem ( 472289 )) + + + > From the face detection in your phone, to the fuzzy logic + > controllers in washing machines, to the ant colony algorithms + > being used to route network traffic, to finding directions + > with google maps, to Netflix and Amazon's recommendation + > algorithms, to OCR for cheques and mail, to NEST thermostats, + > to robot vacuum cleaners and lawn mowers, to expert systems + > in medical diagnosis... (I could keep going) + When I took an AI class a few years ago, one of my favorite + things the professor said was, "What we called 'AI' yesterday + is simply the algorithm for how we do a thing today." + + + ** AI's Strength (Score:2) + (by thePsychologist ( 1062886 )) + + + AI (i.e. machine learning/neural networks) is really good at + optimizing stuff, so its natural strength shows when you have + hundreds of thousands of entities in a system. Examples are the + electricity grid, playing Go, and a department store's + inventory. + In our individual lives, AI seems more like another drop in the + bucket of too much technology, and I think one day we'll realize + that less is more when it comes to the stuff in our homes. + + ** Getting concerned myself (Score:1) + (by SuperKendall ( 25149 )) + + + I was looking at new fridges recently as a friend was asking for + a recommendation, and it's alarming how trying to find a fridge + without a screen is getting to be like trying to find a cell + phone without a camera... it really limits your options. + The only way they could make fridges any worse is the if screens + also played CNN constantly when not in use, like in an + airport... you can absolutely see subsidized ad-fridges coming + down the pipeline. + + ** Re: (Score:2) + (by lgw ( 121541 )) + + + Seems like only the highest and lowest-end fridges lack + screens these days (as well as ice/water in the door, + something else I could do without). + + ** Re: (Score:2) + (by mcswell ( 1102107 )) + + + Come to my house. The refr *has* an ice/water dispenser in + the door, but it hasn't worked for over a year. I think + the tube to the water dispenser is frozen, and if it gets + thawed, it just freezes up again. Same with the water + dispenser on the refr nearest my office at work. + As for the ice dispenser on our refr, we never used it, so + I took it out and got lots more room in the freezer. If we + want ice cubes, we make them in trays, like the 1960s. + + + + ** + + ** Re: (Score:3) + (by sheramil ( 921315 )) + + + > What the hell does a fridge need a screen for? + You can connect it to a webcam inside the fridge and see + if the light goes out when you close the door. + + + + ** I remember a time... (Score:2) + (by Dallas May ( 4891515 )) + + + My uncle was a computer scientist for a National Lab. He retired + 15 or so years ago. I remember just after my grandmother first + got internet, he didn't have it at his home yet because he + didn't believe it was safe -this was probably 1997 or 98, and I + remember him talking to me about how disappointed he was with + the internet. "It was supposed to be this great thing. It's + useless. It'll never amount to anything." + Yeah, he was wrong. + + ** Re: (Score:2) + (by bobbied ( 2522392 )) + + + > My uncle was a computer scientist for a National Lab. He + > retired 15 or so years ago. I remember just after my + > grandmother first got internet, he didn't have it at his home + > yet because he didn't believe it was safe -this was probably + > 1997 or 98, and I remember him talking to me about how + > disappointed he was with the internet. "It was supposed to be + > this great thing. It's useless. It'll never amount to + > anything." + > Yeah, he was wrong. + Was he? Was he really? + How much of the internet is truly useful and how much is just + trash? Judging by my inbox, the number of E-mail in my inbox + the ratio 1s more than 10 to 1 SPAM to worth while messages + (And that's AFTER the SPAM filters.) + I find that this ratio pretty much governs the whole of the + internet.. Where 1/10th of it is actually something of use + and the rest is just useless junk. + So he's not that wrong. + + + ** + + ** Re: (Score:2) + (by mcswell ( 1102107 )) + + + And here you (and I) are. + + + + ** I heard... (Score:1) + (by Hentai007 ( 188457 )) + + + AI is turning frogs gay. + + ** Re: (Score:2) + (by AbRASiON ( 589899 ) *) + + + That's actually not true, the frogs are only gay for pay. + + + ** Nobody buys something because of AI (Score:3) + (by Laxator2 ( 973549 )) + + + I did not see any example where someone says: "I did not buy + that product because it lacked AI". + I did not hear from anyone that they need AI so they are going + out of their way to buy it. In its current form AI is good for + pattern recognition in some cases, for example, face + identification in photos. + The only customers are corporations with massive collections of + personal data to analyze, but not individual consumers. + I believe AI has been over-hyped and pushed in areas where it is + not usable in its current form (like self-driving cars) and we + start to see the backlash. + I've already seen stories saying that the medical diagnoses made + by IBM's Watson are just plain wrong. More examples will follow. + + ** Re: (Score:2) + (by m00sh ( 2538182 )) + + + > I did not see any example where someone says: "I did not buy + > that product because it lacked AI". + > I did not hear from anyone that they need AI so they are + > going out of their way to buy it. In its current form AI is + > good for pattern recognition in some cases, for example, face + > identification in photos. The only customers are corporations + > with massive collections of personal data to analyze, but not + > individual consumers. I believe AI has been over-hyped and + > pushed in areas where it is not usable in its current form + > (like self-driving cars) and we start to see the backlash. + > I've already seen stories saying that the medical diagnoses + > made by IBM's Watson are just plain wrong. More examples will + > follow. + What about Google home and Alexa? + How do you recognize pedestrians in self-driving cars without + AI? + IBM Watson was wrong quite a bit but it won jeopardy. + + + ** First they ignore you, ... (Score:1) + (by Maxo-Texas ( 864189 )) + + + First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight + you, then you win. + Mahatma Gandhi + This field is moving so fast compared to the 90s. + + ** It's a dead end because it's not very good anyway (Score:2) + (by Rick Schumann ( 4662797 )) + + + So-called 'AI' is over-hyped and under-performing. + + ** Another AI winter? (Score:2) + (by OneHundredAndTen ( 1523865 )) + + + The AI bubble seems to be starting to deflate. It may not pop, + but it will likely carry on shrinking. Most people already know + that Alex and co. are little more than gimmicks, good for party + games, grins and giggles, and little more. The AI community + seems to be making the same mistakes they made in the late 60s + and 70s. The second AI winter is nigh. + + ** how do you see non-existent things ? (Score:2) + (by bingoUV ( 1066850 )) + + + If Consumer AI doesn't have a future, how can that non-existent + future be seen ? + In an alternative interpretation, the author has seen the future + of Consumer AI and so of course it exists. But the future of the + future of Consumer AI doesn't exist. I.e. Future of Consumer AI + doesn't have one - where "one" stands for future. + Any other interpretations ? + + ** It's not "Consumer AI" (Score:1) + (by themusicgod1 ( 241799 )) + + + Since the consumer is not control of it. + + It's Anti-Consumer AI if anything + +