![Firefox Firefox](http://a.fsdn.com/sd/topics/firefox_64.png)
![Privacy Privacy](http://a.fsdn.com/sd/topics/privacy_64.png)
![IT IT](http://a.fsdn.com/sd/topics/it_64.png)
![Technology Technology](http://a.fsdn.com/sd/topics/technology_64.png)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - Tor Browser Gets a Redesign, Switches To New Firefox Quantum Engine (zdnet.com) - - - - - - - - - - 44 - -
-- -
X-Git-Url: http://git.nikiroo.be/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=test%2Fsource%2FSLASHDOT%2Fyro.slashdot.org%2Fstory_18_09_06_1651255_tor-browser-gets-a-redesign-switches-to-new-firefox-quantum-engine.html;fp=test%2Fsource%2FSLASHDOT%2Fyro.slashdot.org%2Fstory_18_09_06_1651255_tor-browser-gets-a-redesign-switches-to-new-firefox-quantum-engine.html;h=0000000000000000000000000000000000000000;hb=6e234797ebb6bf2ba83e6e36d95c84cd176091db;hp=b0e05b7d74b390ed89b93f242b34885ceaa97960;hpb=299a08f325f3de71e191b17b16a120d1714e3d7c;p=gofetch.git diff --git a/test/source/SLASHDOT/yro.slashdot.org/story_18_09_06_1651255_tor-browser-gets-a-redesign-switches-to-new-firefox-quantum-engine.html b/test/source/SLASHDOT/yro.slashdot.org/story_18_09_06_1651255_tor-browser-gets-a-redesign-switches-to-new-firefox-quantum-engine.html deleted file mode 100644 index b0e05b7..0000000 --- a/test/source/SLASHDOT/yro.slashdot.org/story_18_09_06_1651255_tor-browser-gets-a-redesign-switches-to-new-firefox-quantum-engine.html +++ /dev/null @@ -1,3054 +0,0 @@ - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---The hardest part of climbing the ladder of success is getting through -the crowd at the bottom.
- -
- -
- -Re: Isn't page render speed pretty irrelevant for - - - (Score:1)
-Not when you have the assets already cached. Most people donâ(TM)t just visit a site once. I was playing with it this morning. Itâ(TM)s a decent speed improvement even within the restraints of tor
More impressively msmash posted an actual tech article not a biasedpolitical article for a change. Losing too many readers now I suspect
- -
- -- -
- -Re: - - - (Score:3, Insightful)
-It's not like a new page renderer is going to solve that.
The point is to be synced up to the current Firefox codebase. Which by the way is awesome. I have all my favorite extensions running, in spite of all the FUD about the new Webextensions API.
- -
- -Re: - - - (Score:2)
-It's not like a new page renderer is going to solve that.
The point is to be synced up to the current Firefox codebase. Which by the way is awesome. I have all my favorite extensions running, in spite of all the FUD about the new Webextensions API.
Why would anybody mod that comment troll?
- -
- -- -
- -Re: - - - (Score:2)
-It is FUD. Firefox's extension ecology is as vibrant as ever, but far more secure. And if somebody disagrees, they should do so instead of taking the belly slither route.
- -
- -- -
- -Re: - - - (Score:2)
-- -
- -- -
- -- -
- -- -
- -Tested today - - - (Score:1)
-First impression is I like it. Video playback seems sluggish but overall positive. Hopefully any NSA addons did not make the cut.
- -
- -- -
- -- -
- -- -
- -- -
- -- -
- -- -
- -- -
- -Who can afford to run a tor exit node ? - - - (Score:4, Interesting)
-- -
- -- -
- -- -
- -- -
- -- -
- -- -
- -- -
- -- -
- -Re: - - - (Score:3)
-You can run something like a Linode instance pretty cheaply and get more IPs. I've run a highly restricted exit node in the past (low bandwidth, select ports), and I've had the same problems with you if I try to use my Linode as a web proxy. My most recent problem has been with Shut Up and Sit Down RSS feeds, which are blocking my host :-\
- -
- -Re:Who can afford to run a tor exit node ? - - - (Score:4, Informative)
-And that's just because no matter how noble the cause, idiots will just ruin it. You don't need a list of Tor exit nodes because if you run a reasonably popular website, you'll find out quite rapidly what they are and auto-blacklist t hem.
It's why CDNs like CloudFlare block Tor - the abuse from Tor exit nodes ensures that whatever trigger you use, it'll be triggered and you'll end up blocking it. It's not like it's done deliberately - you don't have to seek out new Tor exit nodes. They just make themselves known.
I'd even venture to say if you want to allow Tor traffic, you have to whitelist them specifically It's not that Tor is bad, it's just that it's got a bunch of bad actors that really do ruin it for those who need it.
- -
- -Re: - - - (Score:2)
-I should mention that I don't and never did allow access on port 80 or 443, yet Shut up and Sit Down's RSS feed blocks me. There is no way my host was causing issues for their site, with the 20 KB/s of bandwidth I allowed. Additionally, I only allowed ports like IRC, DN
- -
- -- -
- -- -
- -- -
- -- -
- -Re: - - - (Score:2)
-Check out the Library Freedom Project.
- -
- -Re: - - - (Score:2)
-- -
- -- -
- -- -
- -Re: - - - (Score:2)
--Police with lots of cash per investigation at a national level don't worry about anonymous communication anymore.
- -
- -- -
- -- -
- -- -
- -- -
- -