Add title in index pages, add reference in story
[gofetch.git] / test / expected / SLASHDOT / 0102638976
CommitLineData
299a08f3
NR
1 GOOGLE INVESTIGATING ISSUE WITH BLURRY FONTS ON NEW CHROME 69 \r
2 (ZDNET.COM) \r
3\r
4 Thursday September 06, 2018 @11:30PM (msmash)\r
5 from the blurry-texts dept.\r
6\r
c715ea02 7 o Reference: 0102638976\r
299a08f3
NR
8 o News link: https://tech.slashdot.org/story/18/09/06/1839242/google-investigating-issue-with-blurry-fonts-on-new-chrome-69\r
9 o Source link: https://www.zdnet.com/article/google-investigating-issue-with-blurry-fonts-on-new-chrome-69/\r
10\r
11\r
12 Since the release of Chrome 69 earlier this week, countless of\r
13 users have gone on social media and Google Product Forums to\r
14 complain about "blurry" or "fuzzy" text inside Chrome. ZDNet:\r
15 The blurred font issue isn't only limited to text rendered\r
16 inside a web page, users said, but also for the text\r
17 suggestions displayed inside the address bar search drop-down,\r
18 and Chrome's Developer Tools panel. [...] According to\r
19 reports, the issue only manifests for Chrome 69 users on\r
20 Windows. Those who rolled back to Chrome 68 stopped having\r
21 problems. Users said that changing Chrome, operating system,\r
22 or screen DPI settings didn't help. "Our team is investigating\r
23 reports of this behavior. You can find more information in\r
24 this public bug report," a Google spokesperson said last night\r
25 after first user complaints started surfacing online. Some\r
26 users have also expressed concerns over Chrome not showing\r
27 "trivial subdomains" including www and secure lock sign in the\r
28 address bar.\r
29\r
30\r
31 ** Whats the deal (Score:2)\r
32 (by 110010001000 ( 697113 ))\r
33\r
34 \r
35 Whats the deal with the new interface. Looks like we are back to\r
36 rounded corners again.\r
37\r
38 ** \r
39\r
40 ** Re: (Score:1)\r
41 (by 110010001000 ( 697113 ))\r
42\r
43 \r
44 And what's the deal with decaf coffee? How do they get the\r
45 caffeine out of there, and then where does it go?\r
46\r
47 ** Re: (Score:1)\r
48 (by Anonymous Coward)\r
49\r
50 \r
51 Why do they put caffeine in coffee and then take it\r
52 back out?\r
53 And why if Chrome rendering fonts in the first place?\r
54 That's a job for the operating system.\r
55\r
56\r
57 ** Re: Whats the deal (Score:2)\r
58 (by spongman ( 182339 ))\r
59\r
60 \r
61 dichloromethe (or ethyl acetate) leeching.\r
62\r
63\r
64\r
65 ** Re: (Score:2)\r
66 (by DontBeAMoran ( 4843879 ))\r
67\r
68 \r
69 Score: 5, That's gold Jerry, GOLD!\r
70\r
71\r
72\r
73 ** So Chrome 69 makes you blind? (Score:4, Funny)\r
74 (by the_skywise ( 189793 ))\r
75\r
76 \r
77 The jokes write themselves...\r
78\r
79 ** Blurry Fonts... (Score:2)\r
80 (by Oswald McWeany ( 2428506 ))\r
81\r
82 \r
83 Maybe they need to put on their Google Glass so they can read\r
84 the fonts clearer.\r
85\r
86 ** Re: (Score:3)\r
87 (by Z00L00K ( 682162 ))\r
88\r
89 \r
90 They just started to use Cleartype and the fuzzy fonts.\r
91 Both cleartype and fuzzy fonts gives me a headache so I have\r
92 to use uBlock to revert to the browser default when I run\r
93 Firefox.\r
94\r
95\r
96 ** I bet you (Score:5, Insightful)\r
97 (by The MAZZTer ( 911996 ))\r
98\r
99 \r
100 If these are Windows users they screwed with the Compatibility\r
101 Mode options for DPI in order to make the window smaller or\r
102 bigger. It looked fine until Google did something differently\r
103 and now the Compatibility Mode options make it look blurry.\r
104 Turns out using options designed for use on legacy applications\r
105 only on modern applications introduces problems. Lots of Steam\r
106 users have similar problems.\r
107\r
108 ** Re: (Score:2)\r
109 (by omnichad ( 1198475 ))\r
110\r
111 \r
112 Wrong. I use the standard DPI settings for the whole screen\r
113 (1.5x on my 27" 4K screen), which only works with programs\r
114 that are DPI-aware. It's true that I didn't notice the blurry\r
115 fonts until I saw the headline, but I really just thought I\r
116 was that tired (I've only had 69 for about a day). At least\r
117 for me, it's fairly mild.\r
118\r
119 ** \r
120\r
121 ** Re: (Score:2)\r
122 (by omnichad ( 1198475 ))\r
123\r
124 \r
125 If it looks significantly worse, it could also have\r
126 nothing at all to do with the bug - Chrome is DPI aware\r
127 and should never have that enabled. Especially since\r
128 the bug report doesn't have any mention of anything but\r
129 the system DPI setting.\r
130\r
131\r
132\r
133 ** \r
134\r
135 ** Re: (Score:2)\r
136 (by omnichad ( 1198475 ))\r
137\r
138 \r
139 So you like the way I word it (No Giggity).\r
140\r
141\r
142\r
143\r
144 ** Re: (Score:3)\r
145 (by Solandri ( 704621 ))\r
146\r
147 \r
148 The problem is there are three ways to tweak the DPI.\r
149 Compatibility Mode, which can be set on a per-app basis.\r
150 Display scaling, which is set via the Windows desktop and\r
151 affects everything. And Advanced Scaling which Microsoft\r
152 introduced with the Spring Creators Update, which I haven't\r
153 figured out exactly how it's different from the regular\r
154 Display Scaling.\r
155 \r
156 Under the hood, there's also ClearType which runs on top of\r
157 DPI scaling, and does [1]subpixel rendering [grc.com] (using\r
158 the individual red, green, and blue subp\r
159 \r
160 \r
161 \r
162 \r
163 [1] https://www.grc.com/ctwhat.htm\r
164\r
165 ** Re: (Score:2)\r
166 (by omnichad ( 1198475 ))\r
167\r
168 \r
169 Looking at some zoomed in screenshots, I think they're\r
170 scaling the subpixel rendering itself (which should never\r
171 happen). There is no reason to have red or blue tint on\r
172 anything but the outermost pixel, but looking at my\r
173 screenshot close up I'm seeing two side-by-side bluish or\r
174 reddish pixels.\r
175\r
176\r
177\r
178 ** Re: (Score:2)\r
179 (by Scoth ( 879800 ))\r
180\r
181 \r
182 Even on Chrome 69 on my multi-DPI work setup I have to turn\r
183 on the DPI scaling compatibility mode/override to not get\r
184 huge dialog boxes and widgets. It's a bit frustrating to me\r
185 that a currently supported, modern app would still have\r
186 problems with that.\r
187\r
188\r
189 ** Re: (Score:2)\r
190 (by Ingenium13 ( 162116 ))\r
191\r
192 \r
193 Nope, I have a Windows VM that's essentially stock that I use\r
194 for a couple applications. I had Chrome open in it earlier\r
195 today, and noticed that the fonts were blurry and were giving\r
196 me a headache after a few minutes of use. I thought maybe it\r
197 was something with RDP messing it up, but after I read this,\r
198 I logged in again and verified that the fuzzy fonts are only\r
199 in Chrome. All other applications are fine.\r
200\r
201\r
202 ** Re: (Score:2)\r
203 (by greenwow ( 3635575 ))\r
204\r
205 \r
206 And most Windows apps. For most of our users on Windows 10,\r
207 Windows apps have blurry text no matter what settings we try.\r
208 That really sucks for developers that need to read a lot of\r
209 text.\r
210\r
211\r
212 ** \r
213\r
214 ** Re: I bet you (Score:2)\r
215 (by spongman ( 182339 ))\r
216\r
217 \r
218 They don't?\r
219\r
220\r
221\r
222 ** Not new (Score:2)\r
223 (by Tailhook ( 98486 ))\r
224\r
225 \r
226 Chrome has been having this problem for certain desktop users\r
227 for a while now. There are workaround flags and whatnot. Just\r
228 another chronic quality problem in Chrome that never gets\r
229 fixed....\r
230\r
231 ** Re: (Score:1)\r
232 (by MidSpeck ( 1516577 ))\r
233\r
234 \r
235 True. I had to disable "Accelerated 2D canvas" in order to\r
236 get the fuzziness to go away on mine on Chrome 68, which was\r
237 working just fine before that.\r
238\r
239\r
240 ** \r
241\r
242 ** Re: (Score:2)\r
243 (by Z34107 ( 925136 ))\r
244\r
245 \r
246 Text wrapping is a "solved" problem, too, but you're still\r
247 doing it by hand for some reason.\r
248\r
249\r
250 ** While they're at it (Score:2)\r
251 (by Pedestrianwolf ( 1591767 ))\r
252\r
253 \r
254 ..maybe they could also roll back all rounded rectangles they\r
255 added in v69. Everything is so round it feels like I designed it\r
256 in my basement.\r
257\r
258 ** Re: (Score:3)\r
259 (by ArchieBunker ( 132337 ))\r
260\r
261 \r
262 Chrome has a major UI re-design? Firefox is going to be\r
263 pulling some late nights to catch up!\r
264\r
265\r
266 ** It's also has performance regressions (Score:2)\r
267 (by Suren Enfiajyan ( 4600031 ))\r
268\r
269 \r
270 On my Lenovo G570 the latest chrome also has very high CPU usage\r
271 on [1]slither.io game [slither.io] and the game turns into a\r
272 slideshow in places with many snakes. Firefox 61 doesn't suffer\r
273 from the this problem, despite the fact that its slower almost\r
274 in any regard. But not this time.\r
275 \r
276 \r
277 \r
278 \r
279 [1] http://slither.io/\r
280\r
281 ** BSOD (Score:2)\r
282 (by jimbrooking ( 1909170 ))\r
283\r
284 \r
285 After installing ALL pages I visit are pure black. No text or\r
286 graphics.\r
287\r
288 ** Re: (Score:2)\r
289 (by jimbrooking ( 1909170 ))\r
290\r
291 \r
292 Fix (Win 7 Home): Uninstall Chrome, delete all browsing date.\r
293 reinstall Chrome, be dazzled by the curviness.\r
294\r
295\r
296 ** Can someone summarize the linked article? (Score:4, Funny)\r
297 (by kaizendojo ( 956951 ))\r
298\r
299 \r
300 I upgraded and I can't read it.\r
301\r
302 ** See Jeff Probst ... (Score:2)\r
303 (by CaptainDork ( 3678879 ))\r
304\r
305 \r
306 ... about this.\r
307 I remember on Survivor®, back in the day, they had a "blurry\r
308 tit," problem.\r
309 They fixed that by disallowing exposed tits.\r
310 Google should remove the tits from their fonts.\r
311\r
312 ** trivial subdomain hiding (Score:2)\r
313 (by Zaiff Urgulbunger ( 591514 ))\r
314\r
315 \r
316 So this "trivial subdomain hiding" thing... it's a crap idea\r
317 right?\r
318\r
319 ** Here's my take as a Mac user (Score:2)\r
320 (by DontBeAMoran ( 4843879 ))\r
321\r
322 \r
323 First of all, I really hate these thin fonts. They may look neat\r
324 on hi-DPI displays but not everyone has one.\r
325 Secondly, the text on the left screen capture looks like it had\r
326 its pixels hammered to the nearest pixel, which is the typical\r
327 crappy-looking Microsoft anti-aliasing while the text on the\r
328 right looks like normal anti-aliased text to me.\r
329\r
330\r