Merge branch 'master' of github.com:nikiroo/gofetch
[gofetch.git] / test / expected / SLASHDOT / 0102640946
CommitLineData
299a08f3
NR
1 VALVE EXPLAINS HOW IT DECIDES WHO'S A 'STRAIGHT UP TROLL' \r
2 PUBLISHING VIDEO GAMES ON STEAM (VICE.COM) \r
3\r
4 Thursday September 06, 2018 @11:30PM (BeauHD)\r
5 from the behind-the-scenes dept.\r
6\r
c715ea02 7 o Reference: 0102640946\r
299a08f3
NR
8 o News link: https://games.slashdot.org/story/18/09/06/2146237/valve-explains-how-it-decides-whos-a-straight-up-troll-publishing-video-games-on-steam\r
9 o Source link: https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/9kmej7/valve-it-really-does-seem-bad-games-are-made-by-bad-people\r
10\r
11\r
e818d449
NR
12 An anonymous reader quotes a report from Motherboard:\r
13 \r
14 > Wednesday, Valve, the company that operates the huge online\r
15 video game store Steam, shared more details about [1]how it\r
16 plans to control and moderate the ever-increasing number of\r
17 games published on its platform . In the post [2]published\r
18 Wednesday , Valve shared more details about how it determines\r
19 what it considers "outright trolling." "It is vague and we'll\r
20 tell you why," Valve wrote. "You're a denizen of the internet\r
21 so you know that trolls come in all forms. On Steam, some are\r
22 simply trying to rile people up with something we call 'a game\r
23 shaped object' (ie: a crudely made piece of software that\r
24 technically and just barely passes our bar as a functioning\r
25 video game but isn't what 99.9% of folks would say is "good.")\r
26 \r
27 >\r
28 \r
29 > Valve goes on to explain that some trolls are trying to scam\r
30 folks out of their Steam inventory items (digital items that\r
31 can be traded for real money), while others are trying to\r
32 generate a small amount of money through a variety of schemes\r
33 that have to do with how developers use keys to unlock Steam\r
34 games, while others are trying to "incite and sow discord."\r
35 "Trolls are figuring out new ways to be loathsome as we write\r
36 this," Valve said. "But the thing these folks have in common\r
37 is that they aren't actually interested in good faith efforts\r
38 to make and sell games to you or anyone. When a developer's\r
39 motives aren't that, they're probably a troll." One\r
40 interesting observation Valve shares in the blog post is that\r
41 it rarely bans individual games from Steam, and more often\r
42 bans developers and/or publishers entirely. [...] Valve said\r
43 that its review process for determining that something may be\r
44 a "troll game" is a "deep assessment" that involves\r
45 investigating who the developer is, what they've done in the\r
46 past, their behavior on Steam as a developer, as a customer,\r
47 their banking information, developers they associate with, and\r
48 more.\r
49 \r
50 \r
51 \r
52 [1] https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/9kmej7/valve-it-\r
53 really-does-seem-bad-games-are-made-by-bad-people\r
54 \r
55 [2] https://steamcommunity.com/games/593110/announcements/deta-\r
56 il/1708442022337025126\r
299a08f3
NR
57\r
58\r
59 ** Just charge a $5K "listing fee" (Score:5, Interesting)\r
60 (by west ( 39918 ))\r
61\r
62 \r
63 98% of the total garbage disappears (as well as a few percent of\r
64 the good). Of course "not terribly good games" will still\r
65 appear, but it gets rid of the absolute garbage.\r
66 Or if people are appalled at paying to appear on Steam, allow\r
67 spending $10K for a Steam "check-mark of marketing", and allow\r
68 users to filter to show only check-marked games.\r
69\r
70 ** \r
71\r
72 ** Re: (Score:1)\r
73 (by Anonymous Coward)\r
74\r
75 \r
76 "Choices"???\r
77 Thirty-five (35) games were released on Steam today alone .\r
78 Go fuck yourself.\r
79\r
80\r
81\r
82 ** Steam wants the garbage (Score:3)\r
83 (by rsilvergun ( 571051 ))\r
84\r
85 \r
86 because there's no accounting for taste, and if you took away\r
87 garbage there'd be no Goat Simulator. As the saying goes, one\r
88 man's trash is another's treasure.\r
89 \r
90 Plus, a lot of good devs get their start making trash.\r
91\r
92 ** Re: (Score:3)\r
93 (by AC-x ( 735297 ))\r
94\r
95 \r
96 > because there's no accounting for taste, and if you took\r
97 > away garbage there'd be no Goat Simulator. As the saying\r
98 > goes, one man's trash is another's treasure.\r
99 I'm sorry, but anyone with a functioning brain would see\r
100 that infinitely more effort and polish has been put in to\r
101 games like Goat Simulator than any of those garbage "asset\r
102 flips" that litter the Steam store.\r
103 Yes the difference between a good and bad game is\r
104 subjective, but broken zero effort trash is much easier to\r
105 agree on...\r
106\r
107\r
108\r
109 ** Re: (Score:2)\r
110 (by mentil ( 1748130 ))\r
111\r
112 \r
113 Will never happen. There are way too many games like PUBG\r
114 that would've never become Steam hits if they had such a\r
115 policy. It only needs to be enough to make the trolls miss\r
116 it/lose out with their scams; $100 would likely be enough.\r
117\r
118\r
119 ** Re: (Score:2)\r
120 (by Escogido ( 884359 ))\r
121\r
122 \r
123 Either would shut a lot of starting indie games developers\r
124 out of the system, thus preventing said developers and the\r
125 gaming industry in general from making future hits.\r
126 Basically, all new games are either essentially\r
127 reskins/clones of existing games, or trying new mechanics\r
128 and/or interactions, and sometimes (rarely) stories and\r
129 characters. Given the typical indie level production values\r
130 are garbage, in general, only the ones that try to innovate\r
131 actually do have some value for the industry. However, first\r
132\r
133\r
134 ** Best New Feature (Score:2)\r
135 (by Kunedog ( 1033226 ))\r
136\r
137 \r
138 > A second set of changes was focused on improving how you can\r
139 > ignore things you're not interested in. In the past you've been\r
140 > able to ignore individual games or product types (like VR, or\r
141 > Early Access) you didn't want to see again. But now we've added\r
142 > ways for you to also easily ignore individual developers,\r
143 > publishers, and curators.\r
144 Imagine how much easier browsing Netflix would be if you could\r
145 filter out whole franchises and showrunners. Of course, that\r
146 might make it obvious how little on Netflix actually interests\r
147 you.\r
148\r
149 ** Re: (Score:2, Funny)\r
150 (by Anonymous Coward)\r
151\r
152 \r
153 Then they could charge a fee to shows that don't want to be\r
154 filtered by you\r
155\r
156 ** Re: (Score:2)\r
157 (by Archfeld ( 6757 ))\r
158\r
159 \r
160 Sounds like Amazon, and the Kindle Library. No matter what\r
161 you search, every 7th listing is a 'Sponsored' listing,\r
162 and even if you specify a particular author or absolute\r
163 title, you always get 10 or 12 additional 'bonus' items\r
164 listed.\r
165\r
166\r
167\r
168 ** Early Access Garbage and abandonment (Score:2)\r
169 (by shendar ( 674986 ))\r
170\r
171 \r
172 How about if a developer starts a EA Project and walks away\r
173 (takes forever with no progress) they are banned from further\r
174 EA? How about if they are banned from the store entirely?\r
175\r
176 ** Re: (Score:3)\r
177 (by AC-x ( 735297 ))\r
178\r
179 \r
180 I'm sure the type of developer who does that would simply\r
181 abandon their old label and create a new developer account to\r
182 carry on.\r
183\r
184\r
185 ** Re: (Score:2)\r
186 (by mentil ( 1748130 ))\r
187\r
188 \r
189 "I'm sick of development, so here's version '1.0'."\r
190 Also define 'forever' in a timescale that doesn't apply to\r
191 Notch, Rockstar or Valve.\r
192\r
193 ** Re: (Score:2)\r
194 (by Calydor ( 739835 ))\r
195\r
196 \r
197 Wait. I see what you did there.\r
198 You mentioned three developers.\r
199 CONFIRMED: Half-Life 3 is being produced by Notch and\r
200 Rockstar!\r
201\r
202\r
203\r
204 ** Great Yet Another Meaning For Troll (Score:1)\r
205 (by Crashmarik ( 635988 ))\r
206\r
207 \r
208 Already May well be the most overloaded operator in the English\r
209 language. As it seems to mean anything anyone anywhere takes\r
210 objection to, or otherwise makes them feel bad.\r
211\r
212 ** Re: Great Yet Another Meaning For Troll (Score:2)\r
213 (by Nidi62 ( 1525137 ))\r
214\r
215 \r
216 The troll in me wants to say that "nazi" probably has "troll"\r
217 beat ;)\r
218\r
219\r
220 ** \r
221\r
222 ** Re: (Score:2)\r
223 (by tepples ( 727027 ))\r
224\r
225 \r
226 Furthermore, unlike console and mobile platforms, Steam has\r
227 very little switching cost. An end user can always just up\r
228 and switch to Itch or Origin or GOG or Humble or wherever\r
229 else.\r
230\r
231\r
232 ** Steam's progression (Score:3)\r
233 (by Luckyo ( 1726890 ))\r
234\r
235 \r
236 So Steam started as "shove it down their throats" Counter Strike\r
237 1.6 launcher. Evolved into highly curated game store over about\r
238 a decade.\r
239 Then decided to suddenly drop all curation and allow anything\r
240 and everything on the platform. Got flooded with garbage. Added\r
241 weird "meta gaming" shit like trading cards. Got games that\r
242 literally existed just to allow people to get cards. Allowed\r
243 some trading and other meta gaming of the system. Even got\r
244 pressured by some SJW types to drop politically controversial\r
245 games like Hatred and even had their recent porn games brouhaha.\r
246 And now, they're doing this. I guess there's just too much\r
247 pressure from all directions, and they really just decided that\r
248 no, we're not bending to various pressure groups, and instead\r
249 just making sure that asset flips and such are not on the store.\r
250 If true, good on them.\r
251\r
252 ** Early Access (Score:2)\r
253 (by tylersoze ( 789256 ))\r
254\r
255 \r
256 Eh, all I really want from Valve is a filter that blocks all\r
257 "Early Access" games from ever appearing, as I'm browsing for\r
258 games on their web site.\r
259\r
260\r