Fix new tests and make TestLWN work

[gofetch.git] / test / expected / LWN / 0000764321

diff --git a/test/expected/LWN/0000764321 b/test/expected/LWN/0000764321
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..df52d21
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/expected/LWN/0000764321
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+      THE HIDDEN BENEFIT OF GIVING BACK TO OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE    \r
+                         (WORKING KNOWLEDGE)                       \r
+\r
+  [Briefs] Sep 6, 2018 16:56 UTC (Thu) (corbet)\r
+\r
+  o News link: https://lwn.net/Articles/764321/\r
+  o Source link: \r
+\r
+\r
+    The  Harvard  Business  School's  "Working  Knowledge" site has\r
+    [1]an  article  arguing  that it can pay for companies to allow\r
+    their  developers  to  contribute  back  to  the projects whose\r
+    software  they  use. " And that presents an interesting dilemma\r
+    for  firms  that rely heavily on open source. Should they allow\r
+    employees  on  company  time  to  make updates and edits to the\r
+    software  for  community use that could be used by competitors?\r
+    New  research  by  Assistant Professor Frank Nagle, a member of\r
+    the  Strategy  Unit  at  Harvard  Business  School,  shows that\r
+    paying  employees  to  contribute  to  such software boosts the\r
+    company’s  productivity  from  using the software by as much as\r
+    100 percent, when compared with free-riding competitors. "\r
+    \r
+    \r
+    \r
+    [1] https://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/the-hidden-benefit-of-giving-ba-\r
+    ck-to-open-source-software\r
+\r
+\r
+  ** The Hidden Benefit of Giving Back to Open Source Software\r
+     (Working Knowledge)\r
+     \r
+     This is no surprise to me. Most of the open source software\r
+     improvements that might help a competitor are too general in\r
+     nature to really be giving the other guys a competitive\r
+     advantage.\r
+     \r
+     For instance, if Lyft contributed Linux kernel or PHP or Apache\r
+     or whatever fixes, the benefit to Lyft of having that improved\r
+     expertise far exceeds the general benefit to competitor Uber.\r
+     \r
+\r
+     ** The Hidden Benefit of Giving Back to Open Source Software\r
+        (Working Knowledge)\r
+        \r
+        This is no surprise to me. Most of the open source software\r
+        improvements that might help a competitor are too general in\r
+        nature to really be giving the other guys a competitive\r
+        advantage.\r
+        \r
+        For instance, if Lyft contributed Linux kernel or PHP or\r
+        Apache or whatever fixes, the benefit to Lyft of having that\r
+        improved expertise far exceeds the general benefit to\r
+        competitor Uber.\r
+        \r
+\r
+\r
+     ** The Hidden Benefit of Giving Back to Open Source Software\r
+        (Working Knowledge)\r
+        \r
+        Even having to debate it seems so farcical. If you're worried\r
+        about people who "do the same thing", the software they use\r
+        is not the main differentiator. How your company is\r
+        organized, how you treat your people and your customers, how\r
+        you organized projects etc are huge, and software is\r
+        ultimately minor. Fixes and changes to software? Incredibly\r
+        minor.\r
+        \r
+\r
+\r
+     ** The Hidden Benefit of Giving Back to Open Source Software\r
+        (Working Knowledge)\r
+        \r
+        Perhaps this is too dismissive, as there is the part about\r
+        letting your programmers do their job to the best of their\r
+        ability. That seems pretty big.\r
+        \r
+\r
+        ** The Hidden Benefit of Giving Back to Open Source Software\r
+           (Working Knowledge)\r
+           \r
+           Perhaps this is too dismissive, as there is the part about\r
+           letting your programmers do their job to the best of their\r
+           ability. That seems pretty big.\r
+           \r
+\r
+\r
+\r
+\r