Reddit test: add expected files

[gofetch.git] / test / expected / REDDIT / 2018-10-09_09-00__Wine_tricks__D3DX9_vs_

diff --git a/test/expected/REDDIT/2018-10-09_09-00__Wine_tricks__D3DX9_vs_ b/test/expected/REDDIT/2018-10-09_09-00__Wine_tricks__D3DX9_vs_
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..25c1ae5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/expected/REDDIT/2018-10-09_09-00__Wine_tricks__D3DX9_vs_
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+                  [WINE/TRICKS] D3DX9 VS DIRECTX9?                 \r
+\r
+  [linux_gaming] 2018-10-09_09-00\r
+\r
+  o Reference: 2018-10-09_09-00__Wine_tricks__D3DX9_vs_\r
+  o News link: https://www.reddit.com/r/linux_gaming/comments/9lc2je/winetricks_d3dx9_vs_directx9/\r
+  o Source link: \r
+\r
+\r
+    Hi!  I  have  league  of  legends  all set up on my desktop pc,\r
+    running  arch with proprietary nvidia drivers, and all I had to\r
+    run  the  game  is winetricks d3dx9. Now I try to install it on\r
+    my  arch laptop as well, but this time the game crashes when it\r
+    tries  to  run (the launcher works as intended tho). So I tried\r
+    a  million  thing  to  eventually find that winetricks directx9\r
+    works.  Now  the  game  runs surprisingly well for a 13" laptop\r
+    with  only  intel integrated graphics. So my question is: whats\r
+    the  difference  between  the  d3dx9 winetricks package and the\r
+    directx9  one?  I  noticed d3dx9 never spawns any ui, while the\r
+    directx9  package  prompts  an  old  looking install wizard. My\r
+    theory  is  that  d3dx9 is just a part of the directx9 package,\r
+    tho  I  am  quite  confused as to why my tower needs only d3dx9\r
+    while the laptop needed another one. Thanks for any clue\r
+\r
+\r
+  ** _clement_\r
+     DirectX is a collection of API, the most common being Direct3D\r
+     (for 3D graphics). D3DX is an extension (the "x" in the name)\r
+     library for Direct3D.\r
+\r
+  ** ionlydosupport\r
+     league of legends need wine staging..\r
+     anti cheat stuff\r
+\r
+     ** SurelyNotAnOctopus\r
+        Both are using the exact same packages (pacman -S\r
+        wine-staging && pacman -S $(pactree -l wine-staging))\r
+\r
+\r
+  ** thedoogster\r
+     IIRC one of them installs a lot more ? I had a weird issue at\r
+     one point where I needed to install d3dx9 to play the Monkey\r
+     Island Special Editions.\r
+\r
+  ** breell\r
+     I'm not sure but look at the verbs in winetricks, there are\r
+     comments about that:\r
+     [1]https://github.com/Winetricks/winetricks/blob/master/src/wine-\r
+     tricks#L6514\r
+     \r
+     \r
+     \r
+     \r
+     [1]\r
+     https://github.com/Winetricks/winetricks/blob/master/src/winetri-\r
+     cks#L6514\r
+\r
+  ** Adam_Stambaugh0\r
+     Try sticking to d3dx9_36 if you need it. Otherwise, WINE's\r
+     builtin alternative should be fine. D3dx9 just extracks the\r
+     components needed from the directx9 installer. Directx9 installs\r
+     the whole thing, even the parts that tend to conflict with WINE.\r
+     The game on the intel laptop was probably trying to run a bit of\r
+     different code for the intel chipset, something that wasn't\r
+     properly handled by WINE's alternative.\r
+\r
+  ** DesertFroggo\r
+     Just play Dota 2...\r
+\r
+\r