</head>
<body>
<div class='story'>
- <h1>Icelanders Seek To Keep Remote Nordic Peninsula Digital-Free (apnews.com)</h1>
+ <h2>Icelanders Seek To Keep Remote Nordic Peninsula Digital-Free (apnews.com)</h2>
<div class='details'>(Thursday September 06, 2018 @11:30PM (BeauHD)
from the no-cellphones-allowed dept.)</div>
<br/>
<ul>
+ <li>Reference: <a href=''>0102641672</a></li>
<li>News link: <a href='https://mobile.slashdot.org/story/18/09/06/235254/icelanders-seek-to-keep-remote-nordic-peninsula-digital-free'>https://mobile.slashdot.org/story/18/09/06/235254/icelanders-seek-to-keep-remote-nordic-peninsula-digital-free</a></li>
<li>Source link: <a href='https://www.apnews.com/71cdfb7b1c2245069a6f681f8b8f906f/Wired-Icelanders-seek-to-keep-remote-peninsula-digital-free'>https://www.apnews.com/71cdfb7b1c2245069a6f681f8b8f906f/Wired-Icelanders-seek-to-keep-remote-peninsula-digital-free</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
<hr/>
<div class='comment' style='display: block; margin-left: 80px'>
- <h2>Yeah it's real annoying (Score:3, Insightful)</h2>
+ <h3>Yeah it's real annoying (Score:3, Insightful)</h3>
<div class='by' style='font-style: italic;'>by Crashmarik ( 635988 )</div>
<div class='comment_content'><p></p><p>You're out in the wilderness and somebody's WiFi is screwing up the colors of the forest and making everything look strange, while the cell towers are driving the wildlife nuts. / sarcasm</p><p>I'd love to hear these people justify how this in anyway diminishes them.</p></div>
<div class='comment' style='display: block; margin-left: 80px'>
- <h2>Because people no longer have self discipline? (Score:3)</h2>
+ <h3>Because people no longer have self discipline? (Score:3)</h3>
<div class='by' style='font-style: italic;'>by thesupraman ( 179040 )</div>
<div class='comment_content'><p></p><p>Because they CAN get Farcebook, I guess they Must get Farcebook.</p><p>I mean, you would think they could just choose to turn off their devices, not bring a charger, whatever.</p><p>Although knowing people from such areas, I suspect it is more about giving one big finger to 'thems city folks' (even if most of these people live in the cit\y most of the time).</p><p>Anyway, good on them for caring, but good luck in keeping such things out. The safety point is also quite valid.</p></div>
<div class='comment' style='display: block; margin-left: 80px'>
- <h2>Re: (Score:3, Interesting)</h2>
+ <h3>Re: (Score:3, Interesting)</h3>
<div class='by' style='font-style: italic;'>by ShanghaiBill ( 739463 )</div>
<div class='comment_content'><p></p><p>> I mean, you would think they could just choose to turn off their devices</p><p>They don't want to just stop using Facebook, they want their NEIGHBORS to stop using it too.</p><p>This isn't about self-control. It is about controlling others, which is a near universal human desire.</p></div>
</div>
<div class='comment' style='display: block; margin-left: 80px'>
- <h2>Re: (Score:3)</h2>
+ <h3>Re: (Score:3)</h3>
<div class='by' style='font-style: italic;'>by e3m4n ( 947977 )</div>
<div class='comment_content'><p></p><p>exactly. I just posted a more descriptive explanation of that very thing a thread above this one. Sometimes it's easier to buy a vacation that makes the choice for you, than having to, repeatedly, make the same choice throughout the entire vacation. Picking a destination that has no access means you can re-focus on other forms of entertainment. Its easy to fall back into habits. By picking a spot with no access, you are not fighting temptation, and i dare say withdrawal, the entire time. The price of vacati</p></div>
</div>
</div>
<div class='comment' style='display: block; margin-left: 80px'>
- <h2>Re:Yeah it's real annoying (Score:5, Informative)</h2>
+ <h3>Re:Yeah it's real annoying (Score:5, Informative)</h3>
<div class='by' style='font-style: italic;'>by Rei ( 128717 )</div>
<div class='comment_content'><p></p><p>Forest? *snicker*. Here's the joke everyone over the age of 8 here knows:</p><p>Q: What do you do if you get lost in an Icelandic forest?</p><p>A: Stand up.</p><p>I've actually not been to Hornstrandir; it's been on my TODO list for a long, long time, but I've lacked one of the obligatory "round tuits". So it's actually surprising to hear that there's not internet access (via cell towers) there, because in general even the most remote places here have cell access. When Bárðarbunga erupted, deep in the highlands, the eruption was livestreamed. And there's a lot more people in Vestfirðir then in the highlands!</p><p>This would of course be more about visitors than residents, given that there's no permanent residents in Hornstrandir. And in some ways I can sympathize. For example, there's always a lot of opposition to improving the highland roads because we don't want to have more cars driving through and tons of people flooding in, and driving really fast on some paved road would totally change the experience of going into the highlands... it would just turn into a set of "sites to see" rather than a journey. The effect of the isolation on you can really be profound. You feel like a person exploring Mars - so tiny in an endless empty expanse, completely devoid of any signs of human civilization except the half-bulldozed-out "road" you take, the endless travel punctured by rushes of adrenaline as you try to ford a river or trying to avoid ruining your car crossing a lava field. And people who know that experience generally don't want to see it altered. So I imagine it's the same thing for Hornstrandir. The difference being, as previously mentioned, in much of the highlands there's cell coverage. At least as far as I know, when I go out I'm not checking Facebook all the time. ;) But I don't recall any meaningful loss of coverage events.</p><p>ED: Just checked [1]a map [wp.com] from my cell provider. Looks like most of Hornstrandir is indeed marked in white (no coverage), while most of the highlands is light blue (2G) or in some places blue (3G) - even a good chunk of Vatnajökull (largest glacier in Europe).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>[1] https://i2.wp.com/www.icelandnorthernlightshq.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Screen-Shot-2015-06-27-at-09.57.16.png?ssl=1</p></div>
</div>
<div class='comment' style='display: block; margin-left: 80px'>
- <h2>Re: (Score:3)</h2>
+ <h3>Re: (Score:3)</h3>
<div class='by' style='font-style: italic;'>by e3m4n ( 947977 )</div>
<div class='comment_content'><p></p><p>Actually this intrigues me. I go on cruises for the same getaway. Sure one can declare a weekend of no devices or technology, but theres always something that comes up that eventually screws that up. I go on cruises with the family and we do not buy the internet package. The fact that its ridiculously expensive helps 'cut the cord' when on vacation. The most online time the kids ever experience is when we pull into a port and visit a place that has 'free wifi'; giving them 30-60 min of checking their email</p></div>
</div>
<div class='comment' style='display: block; margin-left: 80px'>
- <h2>Re: (Score:3)</h2>
+ <h3>Re: (Score:3)</h3>
<div class='by' style='font-style: italic;'>by GumphMaster ( 772693 )</div>
<div class='comment_content'><p></p><p>> You're out in the wilderness and somebody's ...</p><p>bloody mobile phone is playing something loosely called "music" over the shittiest, tinny piezoelectric "speaker" you ever heard. I have personally experienced this scenario while walking the Milford Track (NZ) and in Torres del Payne (Chile). I can only imagine how much worse it would be _with_ coverage: Youtube videos turned up to 11, incessant need to share the latest "news" from home, inattentive walking in dangerous places etc. If your region's livelihood depends on people coming to experience wil</p></div>
</div>
</div>
<div class='comment' style='display: block; margin-left: 80px'>
- <h2>Satellite Internet (Score:2)</h2>
+ <h3>Satellite Internet (Score:2)</h3>
<div class='by' style='font-style: italic;'>by crow ( 16139 )</div>
<div class='comment_content'><p></p><p>We may only be a few years away from Starlink or something similar providing practical high-bandwidth Internet service globally. So they may hold back the tide a bit longer, but the reality is that modern communications will become a fact of life everywhere for anyone that wants it. Yes, that will mean some significant changes to the lifestyles of the people living there, and yes, it won't all be for the better, but I don't see the point of fighting it now.</p></div>
<div class='comment' style='display: block; margin-left: 80px'>
- <h2>Re: (Score:2)</h2>
+ <h3>Re: (Score:2)</h3>
<div class='by' style='font-style: italic;'>by rossdee ( 243626 )</div>
<div class='comment_content'><p></p><p>How far north are we talking about? Satellite coverage is always going to be a problem at the poles</p></div>
<div class='comment' style='display: block; margin-left: 80px'>
- <h2>Re:Satellite Internet (Score:4, Informative)</h2>
+ <h3>Re:Satellite Internet (Score:4, Informative)</h3>
<div class='by' style='font-style: italic;'>by quenda ( 644621 )</div>
<div class='comment_content'><p></p><p>> Satellite coverage is always going to be a problem at the poles</p><p>No, that applies to geosynchronous broadcast satellites, but not to LEO constellations such as Starlink or Irridium.</p></div>
</div>
<div class='comment' style='display: block; margin-left: 80px'>
- <h2>Re: (Score:3)</h2>
+ <h3>Re: (Score:3)</h3>
<div class='by' style='font-style: italic;'>by crow ( 16139 )</div>
<div class='comment_content'><p></p><p>Good point. A quick look at Google Maps suggests around 66 degrees north. I'm not the best a geography, and I had thought Iceland was a bit further south. I didn't realize it was north of the southern tip of Greenland. That could well be outside the range of satellite Internet, depending on the orbits involved. I have no idea what the plans are.</p></div>
<div class='comment' style='display: block; margin-left: 80px'>
- <h2>Re: (Score:3)</h2>
+ <h3>Re: (Score:3)</h3>
<div class='by' style='font-style: italic;'>by Mashiki ( 184564 )</div>
<div class='comment_content'><p></p><p>Seem to remember there was active satellite links in Resolute, Nvt.(74deg/N), so I don't think that's a problem. The real problem was the astronomical cost of those links, short of a stationary polar orbit satellite there is no real way to keep it cheap. So they've been building fiber as a replacement since 2012ish for the far north remote communities at least here in Canada. I think Resolute was finished in 2016ish or so.</p></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class='comment' style='display: block; margin-left: 80px'>
- <h2>Fuck yes. (Score:3)</h2>
+ <h3>Fuck yes. (Score:3)</h3>
<div class='by' style='font-style: italic;'>by DogDude ( 805747 )</div>
<div class='comment_content'><p></p><p>Fuck yes, I fucking love Icelanders. I'm so sick of seeing smartphone zombies everywhere. The addicts and the stupid will be addicted and stupid anywhere there's an Internet connection. What a wonderful, thoughtful, human decision to make. Wonderful idea.</p></div>
<div class='comment' style='display: block; margin-left: 80px'>
- <h2>Re: (Score:2)</h2>
+ <h3>Re: (Score:2)</h3>
<div class='by' style='font-style: italic;'>by Gojira Shipi-Taro ( 465802 )</div>
<div class='comment_content'><p></p><p>I don't see it as thoughtful or "human" at all. Simply reactionary.</p><p>As long as EVERYONE in that area agrees, fine.</p></div>
</div>
</div>
<div class='comment' style='display: block; margin-left: 80px'>
- <h2>safety, use a friggin' PLB (Score:1)</h2>
+ <h3>safety, use a friggin' PLB (Score:1)</h3>
<div class='by' style='font-style: italic;'>by Anonymous Coward</div>
<div class='comment_content'><p></p><p>I spend a lot of time in the woods of British Columbia, Canada. There is no celphone coverage in probably 95% of our woods/wilderness. I don't ask for cel towers, I carry a Personal Locator Beacon (PLB) for safety. If it is that important to someone to be connected, let them use satellite. We don't need more cel coverage for narcisists.</p></div>
</div>
git://git.nikiroo.be / gofetch.git / blobdiff