1 MOUSE ACCELERATION IS A REAL PROBLEM IN LINUX.
3 [linux_gaming] 2018-10-09_16-00
5 o Reference: 2018-10-09_16-00_Mouse_acceleration_is_a
6 o News link: https://www.reddit.com/r/linux_gaming/comments/9lfqhh/mouse_acceleration_is_a_real_problem_in_linux/
10 All Linux distributions I have used required me to tweak the
11 mouse settings before it was usable for gaming.
13 Stock Ubuntu for example comes with mouse acceleration enabled
14 by default and there is no option to turn it off. WTF?
16 Even on touchpads mouse acceleration feels like its doing more
17 harm than good and I dont like it :(
19 edit: Instead of giving me gold please donate the money to a
20 charity or GNU developers.
24 Despite the downvotes this is a legitimate complaint. I've never
25 understood why this isn't extremely easy to disable.
28 There even was a time when libinput didn't support flat
29 acceleration at all while some distros (namely arch) had
30 already moved to it. I downgraded that package immediately.
31 If I remember correctly the devs were quite dismissive of
32 this and didn't think it was a high priority, because who
33 doesn't want mouse acceleration? And isn't setting it to some
34 really low value just like turning it off?
35 No, it's not and yes I notice it immediately. I refuse to buy
36 many mice because they can't track without some leftover
37 acceleration ffs. With Linux being more and more viable as a
38 gaming platform this just can't be ignored. I know people who
39 tried switching to Linux because they heard CSGO, the only
40 game they ever play, runs. They were just as stupefied as
41 you'd expect them to be that there was no option for
42 disabling mouse acceleration completely and that they had to
43 manually edit config files. "Yeah, Linux is really easy these
44 days, uhh, except for that I guess"
48 If you use Gnome or especially KDE, it is extremely easy to
49 disable. Just go to the settings menu and disable it.
52 In XFCE there's a menu for changing the acceleration
53 amount, but it doesn't do anything if I set it to zero or
57 [1]https://bugzilla.xfce.org/
62 [1] https://bugzilla.xfce.org/
65 [1]https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8593
66 [2]https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12140
67 No attention from developers for over half a decade.
72 [1] https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8593
73 [2] https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12140
76 That's pretty shocking. If you're not resource
77 limited, I'd consider moving to KDE since they
78 actually seem to care about what the users want
82 Not shocking to me. Ubuntu and Wine both have
83 bugs over a decade old. I just checked and KDE
84 has open bugs from 2002. Tends to happen with
85 open-source projects. [1]The oldest 500 bugs
86 are from 2002 to 2005 .
87 XFCE's oldest bug is from 2006. Gnome's oldest
88 bug is from 2004. The Linux kernel's oldest
89 bug is from 2005. Wine's oldest bug is from
96 https://bugs.kde.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=__-
97 open__&no_redirect=1&order=changeddate%2Cprior-
98 ity%2Cbug_severity&query_format=specific
101 It's shocking considering the kind of bug
106 Most might not be valid any longer. I was
107 putzing around with Dokuwiki at work, it
108 didn't install cleanly from the package. So
109 I checked the bugtracker for the package.
110 Oldest bug for Dokuwiki is filed against
111 8.10. That version isn't even supported any
112 more (16.04LTS is the oldest, I think). On
113 top of that the specific bug is fixed. I
114 know it's fixed. The current package isn't
115 missing the symlink that bug says is
120 Tends to happen with open-source projects.
121 Tends to happen more with closed source
122 projects as there is no way to report or
123 track bugs open to the public. Windows 7
124 was still running 16 bit dos... Think about
125 how old the bugs must be in that pile of
127 One of them led to a full privilege
132 That's an issue with bug triaging, not bug
136 The user doesn't care though.
139 That's correct. They don't care about
140 bug reports against software that
141 doesn't have the bug anymore.
155 ** TurnDownForTendies
156 I made a bootable usb to see the mouse options in KDE.
157 You're right there's an option to set the acceleration to
158 flat. The last time I used it I was confused by the
159 multipliers where you could type in values for
160 acceleration and "pointer threshold." Good to see its now
161 just a click to get it over with.
164 Yeah, the KDE team have done a great job recently and
165 have developed a modern, feature-rich, and great
166 performing desktop with some of the best apps in the
167 Linux space. It's really come a long way and I have
168 zero regrets or complaints after having switched to it
171 ** TurnDownForTendies
172 Yeah looks a lot different than it used to last time
173 I tried it a year ago. Looks really nice so far and
174 animations are a lot smoother than what I'm used to
175 on gnome. I had to edit a file to stop screen
176 tearing on my nvidia card and disallow applications
177 to block compositing because running a game would
178 cause window dragging and some desktop effects to
179 get screwed up, but I'll switch to it if things seem
183 I had to edit a file to stop screen tearing on my
185 On any recent drivers you can just open the
186 nvidia-settings tool as root and enable
187 "ForceFullCompositePipeline" under "Advanced" in
188 the "X Server Display Configuration". Then just
189 save it to your xorg.conf file to keep it after a
192 disallow applications to block compositing
193 because running a game would cause window
194 dragging and some desktop effects to get screwed
196 This seems to be an edge-case with only certain
197 applications. IIRC, the only one I've encountered
198 any issues with was [1]The Adventures of Fei
199 Duanmu . In any case, you can manually toggle
200 compositing using a global shortcut
201 (Shift+Alt+F12 by default).
203 Looks really nice so far and animations are a lot
204 smoother than what I'm used to on gnome.
205 Yeah the animations and transitions are great.
206 You can customize them too, from "Smoother and
207 longer" to "Snappier and shorter" (or just turn
208 them off if that's your thing).
214 https://store.steampowered.com/app/593200/The_Adv-
215 entures_of_Fei_Duanmu/
218 I had to edit a file to stop screen tearing on
220 On any recent drivers you can just open the
221 nvidia-settings tool as root and enable
222 "ForceFullCompositePipeline" under "Advanced"
223 in the "X Server Display Configuration". Then
224 just save it to your xorg.conf file to keep it
226 Seeing as how we are on a gaming subreddit:
227 keep in mind that this does have a huge
231 I feel like this is a myth that keeps
232 getting perpetuated. I've done testing and
233 have seen no impact in either frame-time,
234 response, or frame-rate across OpenGL,
235 Vulkan or Wine games. Maybe it causes some
236 issue in some edge-case game where the code
237 is poorly optimized, but I've yet to run
241 Dunno about edge case, but it isn't
242 consistent: that's true.
243 I have little impact in say
244 Insurgency/DOF, but both Tomb Raiders
245 had massive stuttering. Same with the
246 vsync effect: sometimes it seems to
247 clamp it to 60fps while other games are
249 So I guess the advice would more be
250 "keep in mind it does stuff; if you have
251 issues try enabling/disabling it".
256 There's an option in KDE called "allow
257 applications to block compositing" which
258 lets games override that and recover said
260 It's enabled by default.
263 From what I gather, that has nothing to
264 do with Nvidia's settings (inc. any form
265 of CompositePipeline ) only KDE's own
266 compositing. KWin doesn't know anything
267 what Nvidia is doing. Via former KDE dev
268 [1]/u/mgraesslin : see [2]this
269 The [3]solution in that thread by
270 [4]/u/UrbenLegend may work with the
271 "block compositing" (since it it a KWin
272 thingy after all). Although for me the
273 triple buffer helps, but not completely
279 [1] https://www.reddit.com/u/mgraesslin
281 https://www.reddit.com/r/kde/comments/88-
282 aejd/is_anyone_here_using_kde_on_proprie-
285 https://www.reddit.com/r/kde/comments/88-
286 aejd/is_anyone_here_using_kde_on_proprie-
288 [4] https://www.reddit.com/u/UrbenLegend
296 My only complaint is that I would love to use
297 Kubuntu, but KDE Neon keeps getting so much awesome
298 stuff I can't make myself give it up.
301 I don't see how this is a complaint.
304 Luxury problem, I would love to have a super
305 stabil 18.04 with the extra polish and stabil
306 KDE desktop, but all the awesome new and shiny
307 is too much to resist.
315 KDE has different mouse settings menus depending on the
316 driver, so that option isn't always there. It wasn't for
320 Yes! [1]Here is a forum post showing the different
321 mouse settings in the preferences. Make sure you
322 install xf86-input-evdev and use it instead of the
323 default xf86-input-libinput , e.g. with cp
324 /usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d/10-evdev.conf
325 /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/10-evdev.conf
330 [1] https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=240218
332 ** the_real_farfetchd
333 Maybe symlink the file instead of copying so it
334 doesn't get out of sync when the original gets
338 Yeah, probably not a bad idea. I don't
339 necessarily trust the package keeping it in the
340 same place either though, so maybe both. 🤔
346 When was this? It's there on the default configuration
347 for: Fedora 28, Arch (and Arch-based), Kubuntu 18.04,
353 wait, with KDE i can completely disable this? im
354 installing this weekend!
359 It is, and it's why I helped to get the Linux Mint developers
360 to turn it off by default. There is an option in mouse
361 settings for "custom acceleration" where you can turn it back
362 on, though, if you want it. But seriously, most everyone
363 seems to prefer it off, hence why they changed that. It's
364 stupid to have accel be the default, and even if you make it
365 the default, at least provide a way to easily disable it.
366 All distros should do the same. No mouse acceleration is a
370 When was this? i was using mint earlier this year and it
371 was impossible for someone like me to remove.
375 As someone who moved from Windows to Mint a few weeks ago,
376 thank you! This thread had me worried but I was surprised
377 to see it turned off by default.
380 Disabling mouse acceleration is a "massively niche
381 feature"? Did I really just read that on a gaming
385 He would feel right at home on gnome.
393 I am yet to meet anyone IRL that remotely cares
394 about this. And most of the people I know are geeks
396 Reality is that most of the people don't care, and
397 if we added this feature to the UI they would feel
398 confused about it and mess it up and then wonder why
399 their mouse is acting glitchy on Linux.
400 If instead, we leave it like it is, the people who
401 care can run the terminal commands or install the
402 right packages or whatever.
409 The people here are to 1337 for ease of use stuff
413 Install gnome tweak tool go to keyboard and mouse and change
414 mouse profile to flat
417 Yeah thats the solution on stock Ubuntu but you shouldnt have
418 to install software to change mouse settings...
420 ** redstoolthrowawayy
421 Actually the function is already part of gnome, the tweak
422 tool makes it easier to access and saves the setting.
425 Huh. I had to install it when I tried stock Ubuntu.
428 Debian (on which Ubuntu is based upon) installs it
429 as part of the gnome metapackage, I don't know why
430 Ubuntu removed Tweaks from the metapackage.
433 My guess would be to "simplify" the experience.
434 Less options means easier to use.
438 ** ImpersonalComputer
439 You had to install gnome tweak tool to change the
440 setting using a GUI but you could have changed it
441 manually by editing dconf.
444 Any idea why tweak tool is not installed by
445 default, or even integrated into the Settings
446 dialogue? It's so helpful I don't understand why
447 everyone wouldn't want it
450 Because that gives users control, which is
451 against the Gnome philosophy.
454 Gnome doesn't decide on the default
455 packages for a distribution. As mentioned
456 above in this same comment thread, Ubuntu's
457 upstream (Debian) does include Tweaks by
458 default with the 'gnome' metapackage.
461 Gnome does decide to ship 4 different
462 UIs to do one job, and all as separate
466 True, but that isn't the same thing
467 you initially said which is that they
468 don't like giving control. They just
469 aren't organizing it very well.
477 I think the point they are making is that it's
478 not a default GUI option, people who are just
479 switching over from windows, and doing so as
480 gamers are likely not familiar with non-GUI
481 methods of adjusting settings.
482 [1]This is what they see on Ubuntu, and to be
483 honest, it leaves the impression to a new user
484 that disabling mouse acceleration is not an
491 [1] https://imgur.com/xD5rIqI
493 ** ImpersonalComputer
494 I agree, it should be a part of Ubuntu’s basic
495 features I was just trying to clarify that it
496 can be done without installing the gnome tweak
505 I mean you can't really blame one distro when they all use
506 libinput, if anything synapse if the one to blame
509 They could've put a slider in their mouse settings
513 Microsoft could have used just the 'Control Panel'
514 as opposed to the 'Control Panel' and the 'Settings
515 Panel' couldn't they?
516 A classic example of a non intuitive GUI if I ever
517 saw one. It's easier opening a configuration file
518 and copy/pasting simple text.
524 Well they are shipping the Gnome settings manager with a
525 few tweaks. This is more of a Gnome problem than an Ubuntu
531 OK, I had no idea that's what that did! Thank you for helping
532 OP and thus others. More like you, please! :-)
536 [1]https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Mouse_acceleration
541 [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Mouse_acceleration
544 [Something like this?] ( [1]https://imgur.com/xGmEY1A )
549 [1] https://imgur.com/xGmEY1A
552 Does that really turn it off though? I've never seen a GUI
553 that actually sets a [1]flat acceleration profile . Granted,
554 I don't use many GUIs, but stock distros were always lacking
561 https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Mouse_acceleration#Disab-
562 ling_mouse_acceleration
565 KDE at least appears to. [1]https://i.imgur.com/3pOG6uL.png
570 [1] https://i.imgur.com/3pOG6uL.png
573 That doesn't seem to work perfectly. I've tested it a
574 bunch of times and it seems to still have a bit of
578 Would be nice to file a bug report with your
583 The profile toggle doesn't seem to work, it does not
585 It seems to work for some though.
592 Then you haven't used Linux Mint, as I helped to get the
593 developers to turn it off by default. There is an option in
594 mouse settings for "custom acceleration" where you can turn it
595 back on, though, if you want it. But seriously, most everyone
596 seems to prefer it off, hence why they changed that.
597 All distros should do the same. No mouse acceleration is a sane
601 I fucking love Linux mint
605 Ok this may be the DUMBEST question - but I use the GUI option
606 in plasma to set flat acceleration rate - but then I do
608 $ xinput list-props {1..50} 2>/dev/null | fgrep 'libinput Accel
610 And it claims acceleration is still on... (ie reads 1, 0 instead
612 Is it me just not getting it, or freaking out for nothing? If
614 EDIT: should be noted that I have a hard time checking
615 "manually" (ie testing going quick over the same space as you've
616 recently dragged it slowly to see if it goes "farther" when
617 moving fast) but my aim in CSGO "feels" shaky. Could be just me
618 stressing out and getting shaky aim due to that suspicion.
621 best way to test is to set 2 heavy objects between your mouse
622 and move between them fast or slow. If your mouse doesn't
623 return to roughly the same spot you're good.(unless you've
624 got some $500 mouse it's not gonna be pixel-perfect)
627 Thats the one I usually do (although not THAT heavy), will
628 do some more of it though just to calm my nerves - which
629 may just as well be what messes it up. CS is such a
630 "confidence game", and a small streak of losses really
631 makes you wonder and question etc etc...
636 You are correct. The profile toggle does not work, at least
637 for some, the profile does not change.
641 KDE Plasma lets you disable mouse acceleration out of the box.
644 Does it have an option for sensitivity yet? On 5.13 I could
645 only find accel but not sensitivity.
648 I think the acceleration option might just be a poorly
649 worded sensitivity option, so long as you set it to flat
650 profile underneath. I could be wrong though, just going
651 off a brief mouse-feel test and it feels unaccelerated.
654 Just tested it. No, it's definitely acceleration.
657 That slider does work as a sensitivity/speed slider
659 The problem is that changing the profile there
660 doesn't seem to work for some people, hence why
661 people have different experiences.
662 If you set the profile to flat by other means that
663 slider can be used for sensitivity.
670 I guess you are using the stable version. That option is gone
671 in the settings of new versions.
674 It's there for me on Plasma 5.14 beta.
677 What distro are you on?
686 Just chiming in that I still have that option in 5.13.5
687 (Flat Acceleration Rate checkbox underneath the slider)
692 is it weird that i have never faced the said problems for the
693 last 6 years of my life as a full time linux user?
696 I've never had these issues either.
699 It's mostly what you're used to. In the past I did most of
700 my gaming on Windows, so Linux felt off and OS X was
702 Switched to Linux full-time a couple of months for gaming
703 (everything else I had been doing on Unix for ages
704 anyway), set my mouse settings to something that felt
705 nice[1] and no issues after one or two days.
706 [1] xset b off mouse 2/1 4
711 Just to be a bit pedantic, this is not a Linux issue as it has
712 nothing to do with the kernel. It is really an issue with
713 whatever Desktop Environment(s) you are using.
714 Some DEs have this built into to their settings UI, some do not.
715 If there is a specific DE you love, but does not offer this,
716 propose it upstream and someone may add it in.
717 There are several options for persistently disabling
718 acceleration. The easiest that come to mind would be either
719 throwing an computer command in somewhere like .xprofile or
720 specifying your mouse parameters in an XOrg config file. If
721 using Gnome, there is always gnome-tweaks, as has been
723 From what I’ve read in this thread, it seems like half the
724 commenters are expecting that there should be some magic
725 software or standard UI element that is mandatory in every
726 distribution of Linux. It’s a bit silly to think that way as
727 everyone uses Linux in their own way and many of us don’t want
728 bloated garbage that we will never use (a UI element for a
729 setting that only needs to be touched once).
732 Just to be a bit pedantic, this is not a Linux issue as it
733 has nothing to do with the kernel.
734 Just a reminder, but you do understand you've written this in
735 a sub called linux _gaming, right? Nobody cares at this
736 point, from a casual user's perspective, linux is just a
737 catch-all term for linux distros.
739 The easiest that come to mind would be either throwing an
740 computer command in somewhere like .xprofile or specifying
741 your mouse parameters in an XOrg config file.
742 While I personally love config files, manually configuring
743 some settings can be intimidating for newcomers and it gets
744 even worse when you also have to setup multiple non-binary
745 vars that only accept specific values (ie dpi, sensitivity,
748 It seems like half the commenters are expecting that there
749 should be some magic software or standard UI element that is
750 mandatory in every distribution of Linux ... many of us don’t
751 want bloated garbage that we will never use.
752 You're spot on regarding unnecessary cruft bloating a default
753 installation. However if a noob-friendly desktop-use distro
754 (or rather DE) already provides a basic mouse configuration
755 utility in its system settings I think it would really make
756 sense if they could merely add a couple of additional
757 elements to expose and configure stuff like this.
758 The thing is, not all peripherals can be supported through
759 the same utilities (at least not for stuff like dpi), but
760 thankfully bosic stuff like acceleration are merely handled
761 by libinput (and others).
762 On the other hand, libinput doesn't even expose proper
763 configuration files, so if you're on Wayland and your
764 compositor doesn't provide a tool to modify acceleration and
765 other parameters you're pretty much stuck with the default
769 ** redstoolthrowawayy
773 That does not disable mouse acceleration 100%.
776 Fr? What does? I'm worried bc I play tf2 with raw input on
778 How can I make sure acceleration is off?
786 You can make commands execute at startup in several ways..
789 Thats way too complicated for 99% of gamers coming from
793 Geez, I've done more complicated things just getting
794 games running the way they should under Windows.
795 I personally think you've set the bar a little low
796 considering the technical ability of most gamers. I
797 enjoy gaming and I had mouse acceleration disabled
798 permanently in seconds under Ubuntu MATE.
799 This procedure is far from difficult (I run 16.04):
800 [1]https://errorfixer.co/disable-mouse-acceleration-
807 https://errorfixer.co/disable-mouse-acceleration-ubu-
811 I've hated mouse acceleration ever since it was
812 introduced. I've never had to "move the mouse
813 over half the table." Called tweaking sensitivity
814 for the available space. Right now the mouse I am
815 using for my laptop has less area than a standard
816 sized hot pad (7"x7"). I only use that as a unit
817 of measurement because my dinner is on a hot pad
818 next to the mouse and takes up more room than
819 what my mouse has to move.
823 I don't use acceleration and my mouse has to move
824 less than 4 cm for the pointer to move from one
825 corner to the diagonally opposite corner on a
831 I have never heard someone praise mouse
832 acceleration, I have on the other hand heard
833 people bitch about it.
837 You're literally the only person I've ever seen
838 defend mouse acceleration. I don't think that
839 number is as high as you think it is. That shit
840 is cancer. Just up the sensitivity a little bit
841 if you can't be bothered to move your hand a few
847 Windows where you need a ton of 3rd party software,
848 registry editing to make the OS not spy and do weird
849 stuff randomly? Just wow
852 Its not a good idea to make Linux easier to use
856 lol no. Gatekeeping gets these people off
857 bruh. Some of them absolutely do not want
858 things like this to be more accessible. God
859 forbid my 97 year old gramps can get anything
860 done on the ubuntu distro I installed on his
862 Imagine this kind of neckbeardy attitude in
863 any other field of interest.
864 "My coq au vin recipe tastes too savory what
866 -- "Hurr durr maybe next time try yourself on
874 https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thum-
875 b/5/57/Lunchables%2C_turkey_and_american_crack-
876 er_stackers.jpg/250px-Lunchables%2C_turkey_and-
877 _american_cracker_stackers.jpg
879 ** civilization_failed
882 ** MasterPythonicSlave
883 i installed arch in less than 10 tries i
884 kno what im talking abou
889 [1]https://media.giphy.com/media/Fml0fgAxVx-
896 https://media.giphy.com/media/Fml0fgAxVx1eM-
910 I have a better suggestion
911 sudo rm elitism-in-linux
920 I guess that explains why I always find the mouse sluggish on
924 Just like Windows, to be fair. Nowadays you can change the
925 acceleration profile in Gnome Tweak tool, if you are using Gnome
929 Flat in KDE does not disable acceleration as some people are
930 claiming, at least not for me, there's still acceleration
931 present it's just a different curve, or it's bugged.
932 Not having proper GUI settings for mouse controls is my number 1
933 issue with running Linux these days. It's baffling why something
934 that so many people want to change/adjust has to be done with
935 editing files or creating scripts.
938 It's bugged, at least for some, the profile settings does not
943 Long live xinput commands
946 Play around with the xinput command-line tool. Specifically,
947 Device Accel Profile (aceleration type) and Device Accel
948 Constant Deceleration (speed). My preferred settings are -1 and
949 1.25 respectively, and I have this script to set them for me:
950 a="$(xinput | grep 'Logitech USB Receiver' | awk '{print $6}' |
953 b="$(xinput list-props $i | grep 'Device Accel Constant
957 xinput set-prop $i $b 1.25
958 b="$(xinput list-props $i | grep 'Device Accel Profile')"
961 xinput set-prop $i $b -1
963 For a synaptics touchpad, use the synclient command line tool.
966 It's true and in KDE at least, setting the slider to zero
967 doesn't actually give you raw input like xorg configs will (it
968 feels smoothed). From what I can tell, there's also no real
969 option for changing your desktop sensitivity once you're rid of
970 mouse acceleration if you don't have working DPI settings.
971 Changing the transform matrix through xinput seems like the best
972 solution, but causes the camera to spin uncontrollably in a ton
973 of games for some reason.
975 I suppose you could make a script to disable/enable it as
976 needed, but most games have menus and overlays that you need to
977 interact with regularly so that would be a lot of hotkey presses
981 in KDE at least, setting the slider to zero doesn't actually
983 Did you set your profile to 'flat'?
987 With the adaptive profile the slider adjusts the amount of
989 With the flat profile the slider adjusts the
991 The problem is that the profile setting doesn't seem to work,
993 But the slider works as it should if you set the profile in
1001 Touchpad acceleration shouldn't be a problem anymore:
1002 [1]https://who-t.blogspot.com/2018/08/libinputs-new-trackpoint-a-
1009 https://who-t.blogspot.com/2018/08/libinputs-new-trackpoint-acce-
1013 Shouldn't it be in the game settings anyway?
1016 I don't know if it's because I'm used to the "enhanced pointer
1017 precision" on Windows, but every time I go back to my Zorin
1018 machine, I keep overshooting buttons, even when moving slowly.
1019 I'd also like to be able to set the sensitivity of my mouse vs
1020 my trackpad independently, because one is super slow and the
1021 other super fast and I don't want to switch it every time I
1022 decide not to plug in the mouse.
1025 On X you can easily disable it by typing xset m 1 0
1027 But on Wayland (libinput), I have not found a way to disable it,
1028 that's why I don't use any distro that comes with Wayland.
1031 Just to stop missinformatiom from spreading, xset no longer
1032 works the way it used to due to the changes in x. You should
1033 use config files, read more about that here:
1034 [1]https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Mouse_acceleration#Di-
1035 sabling_mouse_acceleration
1041 https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Mouse_acceleration#Disab-
1042 ling_mouse_acceleration
1046 Honestly, most people probably want it on, so having to use some
1047 google searches to turn it off is not a very big deal.
1050 Not trying to bash you, but if you're using a physical mouse
1051 instead of a touch pad, why would you want mouse acceleration
1053 It out right annoys me, the first thing I set out to address
1054 on a fresh install is disabling it.
1057 I don't have it on, but I think most people do not bother
1058 ever turning it off and are used to it being on all the
1064 still, there should be an easy to find option for those who
1069 Huh. I actually love the mouse sensitivity and acceleration on
1070 Linux (and Mac). I can barely use a windows mouse anymore, it's
1071 so touchy or sluggish, no good balance.
1074 It's okay if you do - but there are those with high-dpi mice
1075 used to RAW input without any acceleration - and I'm one of
1076 them. It's mind boggling why the common desktop environments
1077 don't allow for total bypass of the mouse input processing.
1081 I prefer accuracy, mouse acceleration on a mouse is the most
1082 frustrating thing to work with.
1086 KDE's mouse settings panel allows you to set the acceleration to
1087 "dynamic"or "flat". I switched it off the first chance I got.
1090 Is that why the mouse is so fucky in Ubuntu? And no way to
1094 You can disable it in Ubuntu but it's kinda complicated, first
1095 install gnome-tweak-tool then go to mouse settings (in
1096 gnome-tweak-tool) then change acceleration profile from whatever
1100 YUp, my biggest complaint about it. Manjaro doesnt seem too bad
1101 about it but still its not ok
1104 Upvote for the edit.
1107 I have used Linux in some fashion for decades. Work, pleasure,
1108 etc. Mouse issues are my most hated thing. I use a trackball and
1109 it's not always good.
1112 I installed Ubuntu 18.04 fresh just a few weeks ago and don't
1113 have any mouse acceleration by default. It was always a problem
1114 before but it seems like they changed it?
1117 I'm just using plain X11 with Fluxbox (on Ubuntu Xenial) and
1118 haven't changed anything regarding mouse. And I'm happy with how
1119 the cursor moves. Guess it's an anti-feature of Desktop
1123 I have absolutely no idea why you got ANY downvotes. This has
1124 been a legitimate problem that has been present on, at least,
1125 all Ubuntu based distros I've used. They want to increase market
1126 share but can't fix the effing mouse? What the hell?
1129 It's the reason I still use windows. Even if I disable the mouse
1130 acceleration from tweak tool the feel of the mouse is horrible
1131 in csgo. I tried 5 years ago and tried again some months ago.
1132 Still shit. We'll see in another 5 years lol
1135 You can't be bothered to look up the software you need so you
1136 use Windows instead, wtf?
1139 maybe you need to read again my post. Even with
1140 acceleration disabled mouse feels weird on linux compared
1141 to what feel on windows. Aim is super important while
1142 playing csgo and if my mouse don't feel precise i can't
1148 This and screen tearing is linuxs doom. We need to fix those
1152 No screen tearing to speak of for me on mesa/amdgpu... I’ve
1153 only ever had screen tearing using intel or nvidia.
1156 %90 ppl are using Nvidia/Intel. There are workatounds but
1157 at the cost of performance etc